WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsSandRidge Energy Inc (SD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 8742% more annual revenue ($14.46B vs $163.53M). SD leads profitability with a 46.4% profit margin vs 2.0%. SD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.82. SD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.28

SD

Strong Buy

76

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.0Value: 5.7Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.01
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+40.9%)

Margin of Safety

+40.9%

Fair Value

$286.16

Current Price

$192.62

$93.54 discount

UndervaluedFair: $286.16Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SD.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$53.44B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

SD6 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.3x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
46.4%10/10

Keeps 46 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
36.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 36.2%

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.8%8/10

16.8% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

SD3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$554.51M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

PEG RatioValuation
2.822/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-3.76M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : SD

The strongest argument for SD centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 46.4% and operating margin at 36.2%. Revenue growth of 16.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 191.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : SD

The primary concerns for SD are Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while SD is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SD carries more volatility with a beta of 0.48 — expect wider price swings.

SD is growing revenue faster at 16.8% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SD scores higher overall (76/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 46.4% margins and 16.8% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 40.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

SandRidge Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

SandRidge Energy, Inc. is engaged in the acquisition, development and production of oil and natural gas primarily in the mid-continent of the United States.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?