WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsObsidian Energy Ltd (OBE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 2888% more annual revenue ($16.25B vs $543.70M). FANG leads profitability with a 9.0% profit margin vs 5.1%. FANG trades at a lower P/E of 39.0x. FANG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 69/100 (B-).

FANG

Strong Buy

69

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.28

OBE

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 5.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.46
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+47.0%)

Margin of Safety

+47.0%

Fair Value

$318.64

Current Price

$204.97

$113.67 discount

UndervaluedFair: $318.64Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for OBE.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Operating MarginProfitability
48.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 48.5%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
52.5%10/10

Revenue surging 52.5% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
179.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 179.5% YoY

Market CapQuality
$57.40B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.59B8/10

Generating 2.6B in free cash flow

OBE5 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
35.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 35.7%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
41.7%10/10

Revenue surging 41.7% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
190.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 190.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.279/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
39.0x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
4.2%3/10

ROE of 4.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
25.242/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

OBE4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
39.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Market CapQuality
$788.70M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
1.4%3/10

ROE of 1.4% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
5.1%3/10

5.1% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 52.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : OBE

The strongest argument for OBE centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 41.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : OBE

The primary concerns for OBE are P/E Ratio, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.41 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at 52.5% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (2.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FANG scores higher overall (69/100 vs 66/100) and 52.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Obsidian Energy Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Obsidian Energy Ltd. explores, develops and produces oil and natural gas in Western Canada. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?