WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsMexco Energy Corporation (MXC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 191924% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $7.44M). MXC leads profitability with a 22.3% profit margin vs 11.6%. MXC appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.63. MXC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

MXC

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
MXCSignificantly Overvalued (-99.3%)

Margin of Safety

-99.3%

Fair Value

$5.37

Current Price

$10.99

$5.62 premium

UndervaluedFair: $5.37Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

MXC4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.5x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
22.3%9/10

Keeps 22 of every $100 in revenue as profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.638/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

MXC2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$18.62M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.0%2/10

Earnings declined 15.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : MXC

The strongest argument for MXC centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 22.3% and operating margin at 18.3%. PEG of 0.63 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : MXC

The primary concerns for MXC are Market Cap, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while MXC is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.

MXC is growing revenue faster at 5.0% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MXC scores higher overall (54/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 22.3% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Mexco Energy Corporation

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Mexco Energy Corporation, an independent oil and gas company, is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of natural gas, crude oil, condensate, and natural gas liquids in the United States. The company is headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?