WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsLG Display Co Ltd (LPL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

LG Display Co Ltd generates 184874% more annual revenue ($26.44T vs $14.29B). FANG leads profitability with a 11.6% profit margin vs -1.3%. LPL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 6.56. FANG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

LPL

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 3.5Value: 4.0Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for LPL.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

LPL2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.18T10/10

Generating 1.2T in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

LPL4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.0%4/10

2.0% revenue growth

PEG RatioValuation
6.562/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-2.3%2/10

ROE of -2.3% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-76.3%2/10

Earnings declined 76.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : LPL

The strongest argument for LPL centers on Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : LPL

The primary concerns for LPL are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while LPL is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

LPL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.16 — expect wider price swings.

LPL is growing revenue faster at 2.0% — sustainability is the question.

LPL generates stronger free cash flow (1.2T), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FANG scores higher overall (45/100 vs 38/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

LG Display Co Ltd

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

LG Display Co., Ltd. is dedicated to the design, manufacture and sale of thin film transistor liquid crystal displays (TFT-LCD) and display panels based on organic light emitting diode (OLED) technology. The company is headquartered in Seoul, South Korea.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?