Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsLandBridge Company LLC (LB)
FANG
Diamondback Energy Inc
$204.97
-0.20%
ENERGY · Cap: $57.40B
LB
LandBridge Company LLC
$86.85
+0.54%
ENERGY · Cap: $6.70B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Diamondback Energy Inc generates 7107% more annual revenue ($16.25B vs $225.45M). LB leads profitability with a 16.5% profit margin vs 9.0%. FANG trades at a lower P/E of 39.0x. FANG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 69/100 (B-).
FANG
Strong Buy69
out of 100
Grade: B-
LB
Buy61
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+47.0%
Fair Value
$318.64
Current Price
$204.97
$113.67 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for LB.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Strong operational efficiency at 48.5%
Revenue surging 52.5% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 179.5% YoY
Large-cap with strong market position
Reasonable price relative to book value
Generating 2.6B in free cash flow
Strong operational efficiency at 66.1%
Revenue surging 40.6% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 67.5% YoY
Areas to Watch
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
ROE of 4.2% — below average capital efficiency
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Elevated debt levels
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FANG
The strongest argument for FANG centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 52.5% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : LB
The strongest argument for LB centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.5% and operating margin at 66.1%. Revenue growth of 40.6% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : FANG
The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.
Bear Case : LB
The primary concerns for LB are Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score. A P/E of 77.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 1.51 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FANG profiles as a hypergrowth stock while LB is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.41 — expect wider price swings.
FANG is growing revenue faster at 52.5% — sustainability is the question.
FANG generates stronger free cash flow (2.6B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
FANG scores higher overall (69/100 vs 61/100) and 52.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Diamondback Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.
LandBridge Company LLC
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
L Brands, Inc. (formerly known as Limited Brands, Inc. and The Limited, Inc.) is an American fashion retailer based in Columbus, Ohio.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?