WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsKimbell Royalty Partners LP (KRP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 4480% more annual revenue ($14.46B vs $315.70M). KRP leads profitability with a 23.6% profit margin vs 2.0%. KRP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.71. KRP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 44/100 (D).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.28

KRP

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 7.0Value: 3.7Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+41.1%)

Margin of Safety

+41.1%

Fair Value

$286.80

Current Price

$192.62

$94.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $286.80Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KRP.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$56.94B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

KRP2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
23.6%9/10

Keeps 24 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

KRP4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
33.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Market CapQuality
$1.64B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

PEG RatioValuation
2.712/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.7%2/10

Revenue declined 6.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : KRP

The strongest argument for KRP centers on Profit Margin, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 23.6% and operating margin at 18.8%.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 208.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : KRP

The primary concerns for KRP are P/E Ratio, Market Cap, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while KRP is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.44 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at 4.2% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KRP scores higher overall (44/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 23.6% margins. FANG offers better value entry with a 41.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP, acquires and owns mineral and royalty interests in oil and natural gas properties in the United States. The company is headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?