WallStSmart

Ford Motor Company (F)vsUber Technologies Inc (UBER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ford Motor Company generates 254% more annual revenue ($189.86B vs $53.69B). UBER leads profitability with a 15.9% profit margin vs -3.2%. UBER appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.51. UBER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

F

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 3.5Value: 5.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.91

UBER

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 6.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FUndervalued (+36.5%)

Margin of Safety

+36.5%

Fair Value

$22.25

Current Price

$12.32

$9.93 discount

UndervaluedFair: $22.25Overvalued
UBERUndervalued (+34.2%)

Margin of Safety

+34.2%

Fair Value

$108.42

Current Price

$75.45

$32.97 discount

UndervaluedFair: $108.42Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

F2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
430.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 430.8% YoY

UBER3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
35.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 35 in profit

Market CapQuality
$156.19B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.29B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

F4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
8.482/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-14.8%2/10

ROE of -14.8% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.06B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

UBER3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-84.6%2/10

Earnings declined 84.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.472/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : F

The strongest argument for F centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : UBER

The strongest argument for UBER centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.9% and operating margin at 14.6%. Revenue growth of 14.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : F

The primary concerns for F are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 4.66 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : UBER

The primary concerns for UBER are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

F profiles as a turnaround stock while UBER is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

F carries more volatility with a beta of 1.66 — expect wider price swings.

UBER is growing revenue faster at 14.5% — sustainability is the question.

UBER generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UBER scores higher overall (54/100 vs 53/100), backed by strong 15.9% margins and 14.5% revenue growth. F offers better value entry with a 36.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ford Motor Company

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO MANUFACTURERS · USA

Ford Motor Company, commonly known as Ford, is an American multinational automaker that has its main headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan.

Visit Website →

Uber Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Uber Technologies, Inc., commonly known as Uber, is an American technology company. Its services include ride-hailing, food delivery (Uber Eats), package delivery, couriers, freight transportation, and, through a partnership with Lime, electric bicycle and motorized scooter rental. The company is based in San Francisco, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?