WallStSmart

EZGO Technologies Ltd (EZGO)vsThor Industries Inc (THO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Thor Industries Inc generates 48389% more annual revenue ($9.93B vs $20.49M). THO leads profitability with a 3.0% profit margin vs -42.4%. THO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

EZGO

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.42

THO

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.5Value: 10.0Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.50
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for EZGO.

THOUndervalued (+54.5%)

Margin of Safety

+54.5%

Fair Value

$263.48

Current Price

$81.62

$181.86 discount

UndervaluedFair: $263.48Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EZGO4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
0.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
77.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 77.1% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.249/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
21.9%8/10

Revenue surging 21.9% year-over-year

THO5 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.5010/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.808/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
14.5x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
39.9%8/10

Earnings expanding 39.9% YoY

Areas to Watch

EZGO4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$25.69M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-16.9%2/10

ROE of -16.9% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-2.74M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.422/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

THO4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.0%3/10

3.0% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
0.8%3/10

Operating margin of 0.8%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-140.68M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EZGO

The strongest argument for EZGO centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 21.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : THO

The strongest argument for THO centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.80 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : EZGO

The primary concerns for EZGO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : THO

The primary concerns for THO are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 3.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EZGO profiles as a growth stock while THO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

EZGO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.88 — expect wider price swings.

EZGO is growing revenue faster at 21.9% — sustainability is the question.

EZGO generates stronger free cash flow (-3M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

THO scores higher overall (68/100 vs 44/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

EZGO Technologies Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RECREATIONAL VEHICLES · USA

EZGO Technologies Ltd., is dedicated to the design, manufacture, rental and sale of electric bicycles and electric tricycles in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Changzhou, China.

Visit Website →

Thor Industries Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RECREATIONAL VEHICLES · USA

Thor Industries, Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells recreational vehicles (RVs) and related parts and accessories in the United States, Canada, and Europe. The company is headquartered in Elkhart, Indiana.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?