WallStSmart

Edwards Lifesciences Corp (EW)vsZepp Health Corp (ZEPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Edwards Lifesciences Corp generates 2244% more annual revenue ($6.07B vs $258.90M). EW leads profitability with a 17.7% profit margin vs -15.5%. EW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C).

EW

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9

ZEPP

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EWSignificantly Overvalued (-544.4%)

Margin of Safety

-544.4%

Fair Value

$12.31

Current Price

$82.67

$70.36 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.31Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for ZEPP.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EW1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
23.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.7%

ZEPP2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.0%10/10

Revenue surging 43.0% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

EW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.144/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
45.7x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-76.6%2/10

Earnings declined 76.6%

ZEPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Market CapQuality
$216.30M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-17.2%2/10

ROE of -17.2% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-68.1%2/10

Earnings declined 68.1%

Profit MarginProfitability
-15.5%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EW

The strongest argument for EW centers on Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.7% and operating margin at 23.7%. Revenue growth of 13.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : ZEPP

The strongest argument for ZEPP centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 43.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : EW

The primary concerns for EW are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 45.7x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : ZEPP

The primary concerns for ZEPP are Market Cap, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EW profiles as a mature stock while ZEPP is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

ZEPP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.59 — expect wider price swings.

ZEPP is growing revenue faster at 43.0% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor MEDICAL DEVICES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

EW scores higher overall (55/100 vs 43/100), backed by strong 17.7% margins and 13.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Edwards Lifesciences Corp

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Edwards Lifesciences is an American medical technology company headquartered in Irvine, California, specializing in artificial heart valves and hemodynamic monitoring.

Visit Website →

Zepp Health Corp

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · China

Zepp Health Corporation, an activity and biometric data-driven company, develops, manufactures and sells smart wearable technology devices in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Hefei, the People's Republic of China.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?