WallStSmart

Edwards Lifesciences Corp (EW)vsZimmer Biomet Holdings Inc (ZBH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc generates 36% more annual revenue ($8.23B vs $6.07B). EW leads profitability with a 17.7% profit margin vs 8.6%. ZBH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.60. ZBH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

EW

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9

ZBH

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EWSignificantly Overvalued (-544.4%)

Margin of Safety

-544.4%

Fair Value

$12.31

Current Price

$82.67

$70.36 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.31Overvalued
ZBHSignificantly Overvalued (-296.1%)

Margin of Safety

-296.1%

Fair Value

$24.14

Current Price

$87.64

$63.50 premium

UndervaluedFair: $24.14Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EW1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
23.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.7%

ZBH2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.608/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

EW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.144/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
45.7x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-76.6%2/10

Earnings declined 76.6%

ZBH3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.6%3/10

ROE of 5.6% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-40.8%2/10

Earnings declined 40.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EW

The strongest argument for EW centers on Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.7% and operating margin at 23.7%. Revenue growth of 13.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : ZBH

The strongest argument for ZBH centers on Price/Book, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 10.9% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.60 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : EW

The primary concerns for EW are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 45.7x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : ZBH

The primary concerns for ZBH are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EW profiles as a mature stock while ZBH is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

EW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.93 — expect wider price swings.

EW is growing revenue faster at 13.3% — sustainability is the question.

ZBH generates stronger free cash flow (366M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ZBH scores higher overall (59/100 vs 55/100) and 10.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Edwards Lifesciences Corp

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Edwards Lifesciences is an American medical technology company headquartered in Irvine, California, specializing in artificial heart valves and hemodynamic monitoring.

Visit Website →

Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Zimmer Biomet is a publicly traded medical device company. The company is headquartered in Warsaw, Indiana, where it is part of the medical devices business cluster.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?