WallStSmart

Edwards Lifesciences Corp (EW)vsQualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Qualcomm Incorporated generates 639% more annual revenue ($44.87B vs $6.07B). EW leads profitability with a 17.7% profit margin vs 12.0%. QCOM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.55. QCOM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

EW

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9

QCOM

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 7.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.17
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EWSignificantly Overvalued (-544.4%)

Margin of Safety

-544.4%

Fair Value

$12.31

Current Price

$82.67

$70.36 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.31Overvalued
QCOMSignificantly Overvalued (-285.6%)

Margin of Safety

-285.6%

Fair Value

$33.80

Current Price

$130.35

$96.55 premium

UndervaluedFair: $33.80Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EW1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
23.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.7%

QCOM6 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Market CapQuality
$137.43B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
21.5%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.558/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
27.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.5%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.42B8/10

Generating 4.4B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

EW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.144/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
45.7x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-76.6%2/10

Earnings declined 76.6%

QCOM2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.9x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-1.8%2/10

Earnings declined 1.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EW

The strongest argument for EW centers on Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.7% and operating margin at 23.7%. Revenue growth of 13.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : QCOM

The strongest argument for QCOM centers on Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Return on Equity. PEG of 0.55 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : EW

The primary concerns for EW are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 45.7x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : QCOM

The primary concerns for QCOM are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EW profiles as a mature stock while QCOM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

QCOM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.27 — expect wider price swings.

EW is growing revenue faster at 13.3% — sustainability is the question.

QCOM generates stronger free cash flow (4.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QCOM scores higher overall (61/100 vs 55/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Edwards Lifesciences Corp

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Edwards Lifesciences is an American medical technology company headquartered in Irvine, California, specializing in artificial heart valves and hemodynamic monitoring.

Visit Website →

Qualcomm Incorporated

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTORS · USA

Qualcomm is an American multinational corporation headquartered in San Diego, California, and incorporated in Delaware. It creates semiconductors, software, and services related to wireless technology. It owns patents critical to the 5G, 4G, CDMA2000, TD-SCDMA and WCDMA mobile communications standards.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?