WallStSmart

Entergy Corporation (ETR)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Entergy Corporation generates 1424% more annual revenue ($13.29B vs $871.93M). ETR leads profitability with a 13.4% profit margin vs 7.6%. ETR trades at a lower P/E of 28.6x. ETR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

ETR

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.0Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.80

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ETRSignificantly Overvalued (-33.1%)

Margin of Safety

-33.1%

Fair Value

$75.27

Current Price

$112.97

$37.70 premium

UndervaluedFair: $75.27Overvalued
KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.5%)

Margin of Safety

-39.5%

Fair Value

$54.68

Current Price

$89.89

$35.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.68Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ETR1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$53.45B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

ETR4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.324/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
28.6x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
1.2%4/10

1.2% earnings growth

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.42B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
70.8x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ETR

The strongest argument for ETR centers on Market Cap. Revenue growth of 12.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ETR

The primary concerns for ETR are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 70.8x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ETR profiles as a value stock while KEN is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

ETR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.53 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

KEN generates stronger free cash flow (53M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ETR scores higher overall (53/100 vs 40/100) and 12.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Entergy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Entergy Corporation is a Fortune 500 integrated energy company engaged primarily in electric power production and retail distribution operations in the Deep South of the United States.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?