WallStSmart

Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsViper Energy Ut (VNOM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy Transfer LP generates 6356% more annual revenue ($85.54B vs $1.32B). ET leads profitability with a 5.2% profit margin vs -5.1%. VNOM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.64. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

ET

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

VNOM

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.74
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ETSignificantly Overvalued (-121.3%)

Margin of Safety

-121.3%

Fair Value

$8.23

Current Price

$19.14

$10.91 premium

UndervaluedFair: $8.23Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for VNOM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ET5 strengths · Avg: 8.2/10
Market CapQuality
$66.09B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.648/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
29.6%8/10

Revenue surging 29.6% year-over-year

VNOM4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
43.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 43.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
89.4%10/10

Revenue surging 89.4% year-over-year

PEG RatioValuation
0.648/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

ET3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.2%2/10

Earnings declined 15.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-225.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

VNOM4 concerns · Avg: 1.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
-2.9%2/10

ROE of -2.9% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-54.8%2/10

Earnings declined 54.8%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-2.02B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Profit MarginProfitability
-5.1%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ET

The strongest argument for ET centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 29.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.64 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : VNOM

The strongest argument for VNOM centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 89.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.64 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ET

The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : VNOM

The primary concerns for VNOM are Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ET profiles as a growth stock while VNOM is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

ET carries more volatility with a beta of 0.65 — expect wider price swings.

VNOM is growing revenue faster at 89.4% — sustainability is the question.

ET generates stronger free cash flow (-225M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ET scores higher overall (63/100 vs 54/100) and 29.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy Transfer LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Viper Energy Ut

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Viper Energy Partners LP owns, acquires and operates oil and natural gas properties in North America. The company is headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?