WallStSmart

Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsUniversal Corporation (UVV)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy Transfer LP generates 2763% more annual revenue ($85.54B vs $2.99B). ET leads profitability with a 5.2% profit margin vs 3.7%. ET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.64. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

ET

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

UVV

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ETSignificantly Overvalued (-121.3%)

Margin of Safety

-121.3%

Fair Value

$8.23

Current Price

$19.14

$10.91 premium

UndervaluedFair: $8.23Overvalued
UVVUndervalued (+74.6%)

Margin of Safety

+74.6%

Fair Value

$207.79

Current Price

$51.95

$155.84 discount

UndervaluedFair: $207.79Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ET5 strengths · Avg: 8.2/10
Market CapQuality
$66.09B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.648/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
29.6%8/10

Revenue surging 29.6% year-over-year

UVV3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
32.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 32.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

ET3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.2%2/10

Earnings declined 15.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-225.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

UVV3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Market CapQuality
$1.32B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

3.7% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
2.892/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ET

The strongest argument for ET centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 29.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.64 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : UVV

The strongest argument for UVV centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : ET

The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : UVV

The primary concerns for UVV are Market Cap, Profit Margin, PEG Ratio. Thin 3.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ET profiles as a growth stock while UVV is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

UVV carries more volatility with a beta of 0.67 — expect wider price swings.

ET is growing revenue faster at 29.6% — sustainability is the question.

UVV generates stronger free cash flow (95M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ET scores higher overall (63/100 vs 61/100) and 29.6% revenue growth. UVV offers better value entry with a 74.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy Transfer LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Universal Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · TOBACCO · USA

Universal Corporation processes and supplies leaf tobacco and plant ingredients worldwide. The company is headquartered in Richmond, Virginia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?