WallStSmart

Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsUniversal Health Services Inc (UHS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy Transfer LP generates 393% more annual revenue ($85.54B vs $17.36B). UHS leads profitability with a 8.6% profit margin vs 5.2%. ET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.64. UHS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).

ET

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

UHS

Strong Buy

76

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.0Value: 10.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.97
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ETSignificantly Overvalued (-121.3%)

Margin of Safety

-121.3%

Fair Value

$8.23

Current Price

$19.14

$10.91 premium

UndervaluedFair: $8.23Overvalued
UHSUndervalued (+78.6%)

Margin of Safety

+78.6%

Fair Value

$1081.08

Current Price

$186.72

$894.36 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1081.08Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ET5 strengths · Avg: 8.2/10
Market CapQuality
$66.09B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.648/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
29.6%8/10

Revenue surging 29.6% year-over-year

UHS4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
21.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
42.7%8/10

Earnings expanding 42.7% YoY

Areas to Watch

ET3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.2%2/10

Earnings declined 15.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-225.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

UHS0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ET

The strongest argument for ET centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 29.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.64 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : UHS

The strongest argument for UHS centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ET

The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : UHS

No major red flags identified for UHS, but monitor valuation.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ET profiles as a growth stock while UHS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

UHS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.

ET is growing revenue faster at 29.6% — sustainability is the question.

UHS generates stronger free cash flow (293M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UHS scores higher overall (76/100 vs 63/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy Transfer LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Universal Health Services Inc

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated is an American for-profit multinational managed healthcare and insurance company based in Minnetonka, Minnesota. It offers health care products and insurance services.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?