WallStSmart

Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsUniversal Health Services Inc (UHS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy Transfer LP generates 420% more annual revenue ($92.29B vs $17.76B). UHS leads profitability with a 8.6% profit margin vs 4.7%. ET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.73. UHS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

ET

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 8.7Quality: 5.0

UHS

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.0Value: 8.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.97
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ETUndervalued (+87.8%)

Margin of Safety

+87.8%

Fair Value

$148.63

Current Price

$19.34

$129.29 discount

UndervaluedFair: $148.63Overvalued
UHSUndervalued (+40.6%)

Margin of Safety

+40.6%

Fair Value

$389.40

Current Price

$169.96

$219.44 discount

UndervaluedFair: $389.40Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ET5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
32.1%10/10

Revenue surging 32.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$68.55B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.738/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
16.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

UHS3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Return on EquityProfitability
21.4%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

Areas to Watch

ET3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
4.7%3/10

4.7% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.6%2/10

Earnings declined 3.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-225.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

UHS0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ET

The strongest argument for ET centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 32.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : UHS

The strongest argument for UHS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. PEG of 1.17 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ET

The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow. Thin 4.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : UHS

No major red flags identified for UHS, but monitor valuation.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ET profiles as a hypergrowth stock while UHS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

UHS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.13 — expect wider price swings.

ET is growing revenue faster at 32.1% — sustainability is the question.

UHS generates stronger free cash flow (184M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UHS scores higher overall (72/100 vs 62/100). ET offers better value entry with a 87.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy Transfer LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Universal Health Services Inc

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated is an American for-profit multinational managed healthcare and insurance company based in Minnetonka, Minnesota. It offers health care products and insurance services.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?