WallStSmart

Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsSunocoCorp LLC (SUNC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy Transfer LP generates 239% more annual revenue ($85.54B vs $25.20B). ET leads profitability with a 5.2% profit margin vs 1.8%. SUNC trades at a lower P/E of 6.9x. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

ET

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

SUNC

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.3Profit: 4.5Value: 7.0Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ETSignificantly Overvalued (-121.3%)

Margin of Safety

-121.3%

Fair Value

$8.23

Current Price

$19.14

$10.91 premium

UndervaluedFair: $8.23Overvalued
SUNCUndervalued (+9.8%)

Margin of Safety

+9.8%

Fair Value

$60.93

Current Price

$62.25

$1.32 discount

UndervaluedFair: $60.93Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ET5 strengths · Avg: 8.2/10
Market CapQuality
$66.09B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.648/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
29.6%8/10

Revenue surging 29.6% year-over-year

SUNC3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
6.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.199/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

ET3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.2%2/10

Earnings declined 15.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-225.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

SUNC4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
1.8%3/10

1.8% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

Operating margin of 2.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ET

The strongest argument for ET centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 29.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.64 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SUNC

The strongest argument for SUNC centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : ET

The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : SUNC

The primary concerns for SUNC are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Profit Margin. Thin 1.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ET profiles as a growth stock while SUNC is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ET is growing revenue faster at 29.6% — sustainability is the question.

SUNC generates stronger free cash flow (615M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

ET scores higher overall (63/100 vs 45/100) and 29.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy Transfer LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

SunocoCorp LLC

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Suncast Solar Energy, Inc., through its subsidiary, Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc., provides environmental testing services in the northeast United States. The company is headquartered in Denver, Colorado.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?