WallStSmart

Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsSunocoCorp LLC (SUNC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy Transfer LP generates 200% more annual revenue ($92.29B vs $30.71B). ET leads profitability with a 4.7% profit margin vs 1.2%. SUNC trades at a lower P/E of 7.4x. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

ET

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 8.7Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 3/9

SUNC

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.3Profit: 6.0Value: 6.7Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ETUndervalued (+86.4%)

Margin of Safety

+86.4%

Fair Value

$137.98

Current Price

$18.89

$119.09 discount

UndervaluedFair: $137.98Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SUNC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ET6 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
32.1%10/10

Revenue surging 32.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$65.07B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.578/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.50B8/10

Generating 1.5B in free cash flow

SUNC4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Return on EquityProfitability
69.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 70 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
106.4%10/10

Revenue surging 106.4% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

ET4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
4.7%3/10

4.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.6%2/10

Earnings declined 3.6%

Debt/EquityHealth
2.061/10

Elevated debt levels

SUNC4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
1.2%3/10

1.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Debt/EquityHealth
5.961/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ET

The strongest argument for ET centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 32.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.57 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SUNC

The strongest argument for SUNC centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. Revenue growth of 106.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ET

The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.06 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 4.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : SUNC

The primary concerns for SUNC are EPS Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 5.96 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 1.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SUNC is growing revenue faster at 106.4% — sustainability is the question.

ET generates stronger free cash flow (1.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

ET scores higher overall (65/100 vs 54/100) and 32.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy Transfer LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

SunocoCorp LLC

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Suncast Solar Energy, Inc., through its subsidiary, Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc., provides environmental testing services in the northeast United States. The company is headquartered in Denver, Colorado.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?