WallStSmart

Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsSouthern Company (SO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy Transfer LP generates 206% more annual revenue ($92.29B vs $30.18B). SO leads profitability with a 14.5% profit margin vs 4.7%. ET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.73. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

ET

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 8.7Quality: 5.0

SO

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 3.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ETUndervalued (+87.8%)

Margin of Safety

+87.8%

Fair Value

$148.63

Current Price

$19.34

$129.29 discount

UndervaluedFair: $148.63Overvalued
SOSignificantly Overvalued (-26.1%)

Margin of Safety

-26.1%

Fair Value

$73.33

Current Price

$91.80

$18.47 premium

UndervaluedFair: $73.33Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ET5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
32.1%10/10

Revenue surging 32.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$68.55B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.738/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
16.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SO3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$103.49B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
25.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.8%

Areas to Watch

ET3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
4.7%3/10

4.7% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.6%2/10

Earnings declined 3.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-225.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

SO3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.662/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-0.8%2/10

Earnings declined 0.8%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.72B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ET

The strongest argument for ET centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 32.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SO

The strongest argument for SO centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : ET

The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow. Thin 4.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : SO

The primary concerns for SO are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ET profiles as a hypergrowth stock while SO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ET carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.

ET is growing revenue faster at 32.1% — sustainability is the question.

ET generates stronger free cash flow (-225M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ET scores higher overall (62/100 vs 56/100) and 32.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy Transfer LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Southern Company

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Southern Company is an American gas and electric utility holding company based in the southern United States. It is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, with executive offices also located in Birmingham, Alabama.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?