Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsPembina Pipeline Corp (PBA)
ET
Energy Transfer LP
$19.62
+1.65%
ENERGY · Cap: $67.24B
PBA
Pembina Pipeline Corp
$48.82
-0.87%
ENERGY · Cap: $27.97B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Energy Transfer LP generates 1114% more annual revenue ($92.29B vs $7.60B). PBA leads profitability with a 22.2% profit margin vs 4.7%. ET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.58. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).
ET
Buy65
out of 100
Grade: C+
PBA
Buy57
out of 100
Grade: C
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+86.0%
Fair Value
$138.44
Current Price
$19.61
$118.83 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for PBA.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Revenue surging 32.1% year-over-year
Large-cap with strong market position
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Generating 1.5B in free cash flow
Strong operational efficiency at 34.0%
Keeps 22 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
4.7% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Earnings declined 3.6%
Elevated debt levels
Moderate valuation
0.2% earnings growth
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : ET
The strongest argument for ET centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 32.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.58 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : PBA
The strongest argument for PBA centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 22.2% and operating margin at 34.0%.
Bear Case : ET
The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.06 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 4.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : PBA
The primary concerns for PBA are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
ET profiles as a hypergrowth stock while PBA is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.
PBA carries more volatility with a beta of 0.70 — expect wider price swings.
ET is growing revenue faster at 32.1% — sustainability is the question.
ET generates stronger free cash flow (1.5B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
ET scores higher overall (65/100 vs 57/100) and 32.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Energy Transfer LP
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Pembina Pipeline Corp
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
Pembina Pipeline Corporation provides transportation and midstream services for the energy industry. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?