WallStSmart

Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsPlains GP Holdings LP (PAGP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy Transfer LP generates 104% more annual revenue ($92.29B vs $45.26B). ET leads profitability with a 4.7% profit margin vs 0.4%. ET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.58. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

ET

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 8.7Quality: 5.0

PAGP

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.0Value: 5.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ETUndervalued (+86.4%)

Margin of Safety

+86.4%

Fair Value

$147.68

Current Price

$19.42

$128.26 discount

UndervaluedFair: $147.68Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PAGP.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ET6 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
32.1%10/10

Revenue surging 32.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$68.82B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.588/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
16.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.50B8/10

Generating 1.5B in free cash flow

PAGP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.708/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

ET2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
4.7%3/10

4.7% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.6%2/10

Earnings declined 3.6%

PAGP4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
31.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Profit MarginProfitability
0.4%3/10

0.4% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
2.8%3/10

Operating margin of 2.8%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ET

The strongest argument for ET centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 32.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.58 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : PAGP

The strongest argument for PAGP centers on PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.70 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ET

The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, EPS Growth. Thin 4.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : PAGP

The primary concerns for PAGP are P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 9.09 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 0.4% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ET profiles as a hypergrowth stock while PAGP is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ET carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.

ET is growing revenue faster at 32.1% — sustainability is the question.

ET generates stronger free cash flow (1.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ET scores higher overall (65/100 vs 50/100) and 32.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy Transfer LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Plains GP Holdings LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Plains GP Holdings, LP owns and operates midstream power infrastructure in the United States and Canada. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?