WallStSmart

Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsNGL Energy Partners LP (NGL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy Transfer LP generates 2326% more annual revenue ($85.54B vs $3.53B). ET leads profitability with a 5.2% profit margin vs 4.5%. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

ET

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

NGL

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 7.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 5/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ETSignificantly Overvalued (-121.3%)

Margin of Safety

-121.3%

Fair Value

$8.23

Current Price

$19.14

$10.91 premium

UndervaluedFair: $8.23Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for NGL.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ET5 strengths · Avg: 8.2/10
Market CapQuality
$66.09B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.648/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
29.6%8/10

Revenue surging 29.6% year-over-year

NGL1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
43.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 43.9%

Areas to Watch

ET3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.2%2/10

Earnings declined 15.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-225.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

NGL4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$1.61B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

4.5% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-60.1%2/10

Earnings declined 60.1%

Debt/EquityHealth
5.051/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ET

The strongest argument for ET centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 29.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.64 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : NGL

The strongest argument for NGL centers on Operating Margin.

Bear Case : ET

The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : NGL

The primary concerns for NGL are Market Cap, Profit Margin, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 5.05 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 4.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ET profiles as a growth stock while NGL is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ET carries more volatility with a beta of 0.65 — expect wider price swings.

ET is growing revenue faster at 29.6% — sustainability is the question.

NGL generates stronger free cash flow (46M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ET scores higher overall (63/100 vs 53/100) and 29.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy Transfer LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

NGL Energy Partners LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

NGL Energy Partners LP is engaged in the crude oil and liquids logistics and water solutions businesses. The company is headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?