WallStSmart

Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsNew Fortress Energy LLC (NFE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy Transfer LP generates 8377% more annual revenue ($107.38B vs $1.27B). ET leads profitability with a 4.9% profit margin vs -149.7%. ET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.67. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

ET

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 6.0Value: 8.7Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 3/9

NFE

Avoid

33

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -1.20
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ETUndervalued (+86.3%)

Margin of Safety

+86.3%

Fair Value

$157.28

Current Price

$21.55

$135.73 discount

UndervaluedFair: $157.28Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for NFE.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ET6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
78.4%10/10

Revenue surging 78.4% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
85.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 85.3% YoY

Market CapQuality
$74.20B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.678/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
14.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

NFE1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-16.4610/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

ET3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

4.9% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.993/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

NFE4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.7%4/10

2.7% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$78.32M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
26.522/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ET

The strongest argument for ET centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 78.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.67 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : NFE

The strongest argument for NFE centers on Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : ET

The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 1.99 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 4.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : NFE

The primary concerns for NFE are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ET profiles as a hypergrowth stock while NFE is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

NFE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.32 — expect wider price swings.

ET is growing revenue faster at 78.4% — sustainability is the question.

ET generates stronger free cash flow (2.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ET scores higher overall (72/100 vs 33/100) and 78.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy Transfer LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

New Fortress Energy LLC

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

New Fortress Energy Inc. is an integrated gas-to-power infrastructure company, providing energy and development services to end users globally. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?