Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsMartin Midstream Partners LP (MMLP)
ET
Energy Transfer LP
$20.32
-0.05%
ENERGY · Cap: $69.68B
MMLP
Martin Midstream Partners LP
$2.44
-0.44%
ENERGY · Cap: $98.59M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Energy Transfer LP generates 12301% more annual revenue ($92.29B vs $744.17M). ET leads profitability with a 4.7% profit margin vs -2.0%. ET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.61. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).
ET
Buy62
out of 100
Grade: C+
MMLP
Buy50
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+85.1%
Fair Value
$136.61
Current Price
$20.32
$116.29 discount
Margin of Safety
+83.0%
Fair Value
$15.02
Current Price
$2.44
$12.58 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Revenue surging 32.1% year-over-year
Large-cap with strong market position
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Generating 1.5B in free cash flow
Earnings expanding 230.8% YoY
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
18.2% revenue growth
Areas to Watch
4.7% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Earnings declined 3.6%
Elevated debt levels
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : ET
The strongest argument for ET centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 32.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.61 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : MMLP
The strongest argument for MMLP centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 18.2% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : ET
The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.06 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 4.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : MMLP
The primary concerns for MMLP are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
ET profiles as a hypergrowth stock while MMLP is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
ET carries more volatility with a beta of 0.55 — expect wider price swings.
ET is growing revenue faster at 32.1% — sustainability is the question.
ET generates stronger free cash flow (1.5B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
ET scores higher overall (62/100 vs 50/100) and 32.1% revenue growth. MMLP offers better value entry with a 83.0% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Energy Transfer LP
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Martin Midstream Partners LP
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
Martin Midstream Partners LP, is engaged in the completion, processing, storage and packaging of petroleum products and by-products primarily in the Gulf Coast region of the United States. The company is headquartered in Kilgore, Texas.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?