WallStSmart

Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsMoodys Corporation (MCO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy Transfer LP generates 1072% more annual revenue ($92.29B vs $7.87B). MCO leads profitability with a 31.7% profit margin vs 4.7%. ET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.73. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

ET

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 8.7Quality: 5.0

MCO

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 9.5Value: 4.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.99
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ETUndervalued (+87.8%)

Margin of Safety

+87.8%

Fair Value

$148.63

Current Price

$19.34

$129.29 discount

UndervaluedFair: $148.63Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MCO.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ET5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
32.1%10/10

Revenue surging 32.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$68.55B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.738/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
16.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MCO4 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
71.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 71 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
31.7%10/10

Keeps 32 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
45.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 45.7%

Market CapQuality
$79.84B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

ET3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
4.7%3/10

4.7% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.6%2/10

Earnings declined 3.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-225.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

MCO3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.044/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
32.8x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
26.3x2/10

Trading at 26.3x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ET

The strongest argument for ET centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 32.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : MCO

The strongest argument for MCO centers on Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 31.7% and operating margin at 45.7%.

Bear Case : ET

The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow. Thin 4.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : MCO

The primary concerns for MCO are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ET profiles as a hypergrowth stock while MCO is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

MCO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.37 — expect wider price swings.

ET is growing revenue faster at 32.1% — sustainability is the question.

MCO generates stronger free cash flow (844M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ET scores higher overall (62/100 vs 61/100) and 32.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy Transfer LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Moodys Corporation

FINANCIAL SERVICES · FINANCIAL DATA & STOCK EXCHANGES · USA

Moody's Corporation, often referred to as Moody's, is an American business and financial services company. It is the holding company for Moody's Investors Service (MIS), an American credit rating agency, and Moody's Analytics (MA), an American provider of financial analysis software and services.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?