Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsKinetik Holdings Inc (KNTK)
ET
Energy Transfer LP
$20.46
-2.39%
ENERGY · Cap: $74.20B
KNTK
Kinetik Holdings Inc
$52.39
-1.60%
ENERGY · Cap: $9.01B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Energy Transfer LP generates 5594% more annual revenue ($107.38B vs $1.89B). KNTK leads profitability with a 29.2% profit margin vs 4.9%. ET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.67. KNTK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 75/100 (B).
ET
Strong Buy72
out of 100
Grade: B
KNTK
Strong Buy75
out of 100
Grade: B
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+86.4%
Fair Value
$156.76
Current Price
$20.46
$136.30 discount
Margin of Safety
+57.9%
Fair Value
$99.36
Current Price
$52.39
$46.97 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Revenue surging 78.4% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 85.3% YoY
Large-cap with strong market position
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Revenue surging 36.3% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 95.2% YoY
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 23.0%
Areas to Watch
4.9% margin — thin
Elevated debt levels
Weak financial health signals
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : ET
The strongest argument for ET centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 78.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.67 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : KNTK
The strongest argument for KNTK centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.2% and operating margin at 23.0%. Revenue growth of 36.3% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : ET
The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 1.99 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 4.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : KNTK
The primary concerns for KNTK are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
ET profiles as a hypergrowth stock while KNTK is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
KNTK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.78 — expect wider price swings.
ET is growing revenue faster at 78.4% — sustainability is the question.
ET generates stronger free cash flow (2.7B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
KNTK scores higher overall (75/100 vs 72/100), backed by strong 29.2% margins and 36.3% revenue growth. ET offers better value entry with a 86.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Energy Transfer LP
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Kinetik Holdings Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
Kinetik Holdings Inc. is an intermediate company in the Texas Delaware Basin. The company is headquartered in Midland, Texas.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?