Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsInternational Seaways Inc (INSW)
ET
Energy Transfer LP
$19.62
-0.89%
ENERGY · Cap: $67.24B
INSW
International Seaways Inc
$81.07
+3.29%
ENERGY · Cap: $4.06B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Energy Transfer LP generates 9248% more annual revenue ($92.29B vs $987.28M). INSW leads profitability with a 55.3% profit margin vs 4.7%. INSW trades at a lower P/E of 7.5x. INSW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 78/100 (B+).
ET
Buy65
out of 100
Grade: C+
INSW
Strong Buy78
out of 100
Grade: B+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+86.0%
Fair Value
$138.44
Current Price
$19.61
$118.83 discount
Margin of Safety
-49.0%
Fair Value
$42.19
Current Price
$81.07
$38.88 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Revenue surging 32.1% year-over-year
Large-cap with strong market position
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Generating 1.5B in free cash flow
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Keeps 55 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 61.3%
Revenue surging 78.5% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 475.0% YoY
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Areas to Watch
4.7% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Earnings declined 3.6%
Elevated debt levels
No major concerns identified
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : ET
The strongest argument for ET centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 32.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.58 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : INSW
The strongest argument for INSW centers on P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 55.3% and operating margin at 61.3%. Revenue growth of 78.5% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : ET
The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.06 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 4.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : INSW
No major red flags identified for INSW, but monitor valuation.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
ET profiles as a hypergrowth stock while INSW is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
ET carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.
INSW is growing revenue faster at 78.5% — sustainability is the question.
ET generates stronger free cash flow (1.5B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
INSW scores higher overall (78/100 vs 65/100), backed by strong 55.3% margins and 78.5% revenue growth. ET offers better value entry with a 86.0% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Energy Transfer LP
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
International Seaways Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
International Seaways, Inc. owns and operates a fleet of transoceanic vessels for the transportation of crude oil and petroleum products in the international flag trade. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?