Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsGoldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)
ET
Energy Transfer LP
$19.34
-2.91%
ENERGY · Cap: $68.55B
GS
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$936.48
+1.15%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $276.27B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Energy Transfer LP generates 50% more annual revenue ($92.29B vs $61.53B). GS leads profitability with a 29.4% profit margin vs 4.7%. ET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.73. GS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 75/100 (B).
ET
Buy62
out of 100
Grade: C+
GS
Strong Buy75
out of 100
Grade: B
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+87.8%
Fair Value
$148.63
Current Price
$19.34
$129.29 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for GS.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Revenue surging 32.1% year-over-year
Large-cap with strong market position
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Strong operational efficiency at 38.6%
Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Earnings expanding 24.2% YoY
Areas to Watch
4.7% margin — thin
Earnings declined 3.6%
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : ET
The strongest argument for ET centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 32.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : GS
The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.4% and operating margin at 38.6%. Revenue growth of 14.5% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : ET
The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow. Thin 4.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : GS
The primary concerns for GS are Free Cash Flow.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
ET profiles as a hypergrowth stock while GS is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
GS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.27 — expect wider price swings.
ET is growing revenue faster at 32.1% — sustainability is the question.
ET generates stronger free cash flow (-225M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
GS scores higher overall (75/100 vs 62/100), backed by strong 29.4% margins and 14.5% revenue growth. ET offers better value entry with a 87.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Energy Transfer LP
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?