Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsGenesis Energy LP (GEL)
ET
Energy Transfer LP
$18.89
-1.46%
ENERGY · Cap: $65.07B
GEL
Genesis Energy LP
$14.21
-0.19%
ENERGY · Cap: $1.85B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Energy Transfer LP generates 5398% more annual revenue ($92.29B vs $1.68B). ET leads profitability with a 4.7% profit margin vs 2.1%. ET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.57. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).
ET
Buy65
out of 100
Grade: C+
GEL
Buy55
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+86.4%
Fair Value
$137.98
Current Price
$18.89
$119.09 discount
Margin of Safety
+4.0%
Fair Value
$18.10
Current Price
$14.21
$3.89 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Revenue surging 32.1% year-over-year
Large-cap with strong market position
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Generating 1.5B in free cash flow
Earnings expanding 58.6% YoY
Areas to Watch
4.7% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Earnings declined 3.6%
Elevated debt levels
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
2.1% margin — thin
Expensive relative to growth rate
Elevated debt levels
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : ET
The strongest argument for ET centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 32.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.57 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : GEL
The strongest argument for GEL centers on EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 12.1% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : ET
The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.06 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 4.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : GEL
The primary concerns for GEL are Market Cap, Profit Margin, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 46.45 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 2.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
ET profiles as a hypergrowth stock while GEL is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
GEL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.59 — expect wider price swings.
ET is growing revenue faster at 32.1% — sustainability is the question.
ET generates stronger free cash flow (1.5B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
ET scores higher overall (65/100 vs 55/100) and 32.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Energy Transfer LP
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Genesis Energy LP
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
Genesis Energy, LP operates in the midstream segment of the crude oil and natural gas industry. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?