Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsFLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG)
ET
Energy Transfer LP
$19.14
-0.36%
ENERGY · Cap: $66.09B
FLNG
FLEX LNG Ltd
$30.26
-2.04%
ENERGY · Cap: $1.63B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Energy Transfer LP generates 24505% more annual revenue ($85.54B vs $347.64M). FLNG leads profitability with a 21.5% profit margin vs 5.2%. ET trades at a lower P/E of 15.9x. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).
ET
Buy63
out of 100
Grade: C+
FLNG
Hold42
out of 100
Grade: D
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-121.3%
Fair Value
$8.23
Current Price
$19.14
$10.91 premium
Margin of Safety
-177.4%
Fair Value
$9.38
Current Price
$30.26
$20.88 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Large-cap with strong market position
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Revenue surging 29.6% year-over-year
Strong operational efficiency at 48.7%
Keeps 22 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
5.2% margin — thin
Earnings declined 15.2%
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Weak financial health signals
Revenue declined 3.7%
Earnings declined 52.5%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : ET
The strongest argument for ET centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 29.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.64 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : FLNG
The strongest argument for FLNG centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 21.5% and operating margin at 48.7%.
Bear Case : ET
The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.
Bear Case : FLNG
The primary concerns for FLNG are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.57 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
ET profiles as a growth stock while FLNG is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.
ET carries more volatility with a beta of 0.65 — expect wider price swings.
ET is growing revenue faster at 29.6% — sustainability is the question.
FLNG generates stronger free cash flow (29M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
ET scores higher overall (63/100 vs 42/100) and 29.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Energy Transfer LP
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
FLEX LNG Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
Flex LNG Ltd., is dedicated to the global shipping of liquefied natural gas (LNG). The company is headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda.
Visit Website →Compare with Other OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?