WallStSmart

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR (ERIC)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR generates 16361% more annual revenue ($240.31B vs $1.46B). ERIC leads profitability with a 10.9% profit margin vs 1.6%. ERIC trades at a lower P/E of 15.5x. SONO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).

ERIC

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.11

SONO

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.0Value: 3.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ERICUndervalued (+61.1%)

Margin of Safety

+61.1%

Fair Value

$28.62

Current Price

$12.56

$16.06 discount

UndervaluedFair: $28.62Overvalued
SONOSignificantly Overvalued (-34.6%)

Margin of Safety

-34.6%

Fair Value

$12.26

Current Price

$15.08

$2.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ERIC4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Return on EquityProfitability
24.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
15.5x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$7.03B8/10

Generating 7.0B in free cash flow

SONO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.159/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

ERIC4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Operating MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

Operating margin of 0.0%

PEG RatioValuation
3.532/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-10.3%2/10

Revenue declined 10.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-78.5%2/10

Earnings declined 78.5%

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.88B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

1.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ERIC

The strongest argument for ERIC centers on Price/Book, Return on Equity, P/E Ratio.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : ERIC

The primary concerns for ERIC are Operating Margin, PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 92.8x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ERIC profiles as a declining stock while SONO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.94 — expect wider price swings.

SONO is growing revenue faster at 8.4% — sustainability is the question.

ERIC generates stronger free cash flow (7.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SONO scores higher overall (45/100 vs 42/100). ERIC offers better value entry with a 61.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ), provides communications infrastructure, services and software solutions for telecommunications and other sectors. The company is headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden.

Visit Website →

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?