WallStSmart

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR (ERIC)vsNokia Corp ADR (NOK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR generates 1108% more annual revenue ($240.31B vs $19.89B). ERIC leads profitability with a 12.0% profit margin vs 3.3%. NOK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.88. ERIC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

ERIC

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.5Value: 7.3Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9

NOK

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 4.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.60
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ERICUndervalued (+73.8%)

Margin of Safety

+73.8%

Fair Value

$42.59

Current Price

$11.47

$31.12 discount

UndervaluedFair: $42.59Overvalued
NOKSignificantly Overvalued (-734.1%)

Margin of Safety

-734.1%

Fair Value

$0.88

Current Price

$8.36

$7.48 premium

UndervaluedFair: $0.88Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ERIC5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
79.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 79.2% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$14.86B10/10

Generating 14.9B in free cash flow

Return on EquityProfitability
28.2%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 28 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
13.2x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

NOK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.888/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

ERIC3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Operating MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

Operating margin of 0.0%

PEG RatioValuation
3.532/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.0%2/10

Revenue declined 5.0%

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.604/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.3%3/10

3.3% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ERIC

The strongest argument for ERIC centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.88 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ERIC

The primary concerns for ERIC are Operating Margin, PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 66.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ERIC profiles as a declining stock while NOK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

NOK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.61 — expect wider price swings.

NOK is growing revenue faster at 2.4% — sustainability is the question.

ERIC generates stronger free cash flow (14.9B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ERIC scores higher overall (52/100 vs 44/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ), provides communications infrastructure, services and software solutions for telecommunications and other sectors. The company is headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden.

Visit Website →

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?