WallStSmart

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR (ERIC)vsNokia Corp ADR (NOK)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR generates 1078% more annual revenue ($240.31B vs $20.39B). ERIC leads profitability with a 8.4% profit margin vs 3.5%. NOK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.91. NOK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 44/100 (D).

ERIC

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.11

NOK

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.0Value: 4.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.65
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ERICUndervalued (+66.5%)

Margin of Safety

+66.5%

Fair Value

$33.29

Current Price

$11.06

$22.23 discount

UndervaluedFair: $33.29Overvalued
NOKSignificantly Overvalued (-59.6%)

Margin of Safety

-59.6%

Fair Value

$5.10

Current Price

$8.89

$3.79 premium

UndervaluedFair: $5.10Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ERIC3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
17.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.33B8/10

Generating 5.3B in free cash flow

NOK4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$51.17B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.169/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.918/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

ERIC3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Operating MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

Operating margin of 0.0%

PEG RatioValuation
3.532/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-46.8%2/10

Earnings declined 46.8%

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.654/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.6%3/10

ROE of 3.6% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.5%3/10

3.5% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
65.3x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ERIC

The strongest argument for ERIC centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.91 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ERIC

The primary concerns for ERIC are Operating Margin, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 65.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NOK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.73 — expect wider price swings.

NOK is growing revenue faster at 8.4% — sustainability is the question.

ERIC generates stronger free cash flow (5.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

NOK scores higher overall (44/100 vs 41/100). ERIC offers better value entry with a 66.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ), provides communications infrastructure, services and software solutions for telecommunications and other sectors. The company is headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden.

Visit Website →

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?