WallStSmart

Enterprise Products Partners LP (EPD)vsDiamondback Energy Inc (FANG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Enterprise Products Partners LP generates 256% more annual revenue ($51.56B vs $14.47B). EPD leads profitability with a 11.5% profit margin vs 2.0%. EPD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.18. EPD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

EPD

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EPDUndervalued (+37.5%)

Margin of Safety

+37.5%

Fair Value

$56.69

Current Price

$37.19

$19.50 discount

UndervaluedFair: $56.69Overvalued
FANGUndervalued (+44.7%)

Margin of Safety

+44.7%

Fair Value

$305.77

Current Price

$188.70

$117.07 discount

UndervaluedFair: $305.77Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EPD3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$81.56B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
14.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$53.58B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

EPD2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.184/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.7%2/10

Revenue declined 6.7%

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
57.132/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EPD

The strongest argument for EPD centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bear Case : EPD

The primary concerns for EPD are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EPD profiles as a declining stock while FANG is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

EPD carries more volatility with a beta of 0.49 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

EPD scores higher overall (52/100 vs 41/100). FANG offers better value entry with a 44.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Enterprise Products Partners LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Enterprise Products Partners LP provides midstream energy services to producers and consumers of natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGL), crude oil, petrochemicals, and refined products. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?