WallStSmart

Estee Lauder Companies Inc (EL)vsRush Enterprises A Inc (RUSHA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Estee Lauder Companies Inc generates 104% more annual revenue ($14.83B vs $7.27B). RUSHA leads profitability with a 3.6% profit margin vs -1.7%. EL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.43. RUSHA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).

EL

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.0Value: 7.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.68

RUSHA

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.0Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.13
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ELUndervalued (+35.7%)

Margin of Safety

+35.7%

Fair Value

$163.80

Current Price

$86.20

$77.60 discount

UndervaluedFair: $163.80Overvalued
RUSHAUndervalued (+55.8%)

Margin of Safety

+55.8%

Fair Value

$164.81

Current Price

$72.31

$92.50 discount

UndervaluedFair: $164.81Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EL0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

RUSHA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

EL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.6%4/10

4.6% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.684/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-6.0%2/10

ROE of -6.0% — below average capital efficiency

RUSHA4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

Operating margin of 4.9%

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Revenue declined 9.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EL

PEG of 1.43 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : RUSHA

The strongest argument for RUSHA centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : EL

The primary concerns for EL are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.74 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : RUSHA

The primary concerns for RUSHA are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, PEG Ratio. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EL profiles as a turnaround stock while RUSHA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

EL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.21 — expect wider price swings.

EL is growing revenue faster at 4.6% — sustainability is the question.

EL generates stronger free cash flow (310M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

RUSHA scores higher overall (47/100 vs 38/100). EL offers better value entry with a 35.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Estee Lauder Companies Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of prestige skincare, makeup, fragrance and hair care products, based in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. The company owns a diverse portfolio of brands, distributed internationally through both digital commerce and retail channels.

Visit Website →

Rush Enterprises A Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?