WallStSmart

Excelerate Energy Inc (EE)vsEnergy Transfer LP (ET)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy Transfer LP generates 6864% more annual revenue ($85.54B vs $1.23B). ET leads profitability with a 5.2% profit margin vs 3.2%. ET trades at a lower P/E of 15.9x. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

EE

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.5Value: 8.3Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.16

ET

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EEUndervalued (+31.2%)

Margin of Safety

+31.2%

Fair Value

$59.90

Current Price

$33.50

$26.40 discount

UndervaluedFair: $59.90Overvalued
ETSignificantly Overvalued (-121.3%)

Margin of Safety

-121.3%

Fair Value

$8.23

Current Price

$19.14

$10.91 premium

UndervaluedFair: $8.23Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EE3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Operating MarginProfitability
32.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 32.9%

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
15.7%8/10

15.7% revenue growth

ET5 strengths · Avg: 8.2/10
Market CapQuality
$66.09B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.648/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
29.6%8/10

Revenue surging 29.6% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

EE4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
1.7%4/10

1.7% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
3.2%3/10

3.2% margin — thin

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-4.61M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

ET3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.2%2/10

Earnings declined 15.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-225.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EE

The strongest argument for EE centers on Operating Margin, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 15.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : ET

The strongest argument for ET centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 29.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.64 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : EE

The primary concerns for EE are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Profit Margin. Thin 3.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : ET

The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.34 — expect wider price swings.

ET is growing revenue faster at 29.6% — sustainability is the question.

EE generates stronger free cash flow (-5M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

ET scores higher overall (63/100 vs 61/100) and 29.6% revenue growth. EE offers better value entry with a 31.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Excelerate Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

El Paso Electric Company, a utility company, is engaged in the generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity in West Texas and Southern New Mexico.

Energy Transfer LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?