WallStSmart

DexCom Inc (DXCM)vsEdwards Lifesciences Corp (EW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Edwards Lifesciences Corp generates 31% more annual revenue ($6.51B vs $4.97B). DXCM leads profitability with a 20.1% profit margin vs 15.4%. DXCM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.35. DXCM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

DXCM

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 8.0Profit: 8.5Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.67

EW

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 8.0Value: 5.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.48
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for DXCM.

EWUndervalued (+68.9%)

Margin of Safety

+68.9%

Fair Value

$254.99

Current Price

$84.37

$170.62 discount

UndervaluedFair: $254.99Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DXCM4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
38.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 38 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
20.1%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
24.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 24.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
43.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 43.6% YoY

EW3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.4810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Operating MarginProfitability
29.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.8%

Areas to Watch

DXCM2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
33.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
11.9x4/10

Trading at 11.9x book value

EW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.924/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
51.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-25.4%2/10

Earnings declined 25.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DXCM

The strongest argument for DXCM centers on Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.1% and operating margin at 24.3%. Revenue growth of 13.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : EW

The strongest argument for EW centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 29.8%. Revenue growth of 13.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : DXCM

The primary concerns for DXCM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : EW

The primary concerns for EW are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 51.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DXCM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.42 — expect wider price swings.

EW is growing revenue faster at 13.6% — sustainability is the question.

EW generates stronger free cash flow (585M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor MEDICAL DEVICES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

DXCM scores higher overall (74/100 vs 55/100), backed by strong 20.1% margins and 13.1% revenue growth. EW offers better value entry with a 68.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

DexCom Inc

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

DexCom, Inc. is a company that develops, manufactures, and distributes continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems for diabetes management. It operates internationally with headquarters in San Diego, California, and has a manufacturing facility in Mesa, Arizona.

Edwards Lifesciences Corp

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Edwards Lifesciences is an American medical technology company headquartered in Irvine, California, specializing in artificial heart valves and hemodynamic monitoring.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?