WallStSmart

Deere & Company (DE)vsMammoth Energy Services Inc (TUSK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Deere & Company generates 69975% more annual revenue ($47.93B vs $68.39M). DE leads profitability with a 10.2% profit margin vs 1.0%. DE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

DE

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.3Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.18

TUSK

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 4.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.10
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for DE.

TUSKSignificantly Overvalued (-88.2%)

Margin of Safety

-88.2%

Fair Value

$1.27

Current Price

$3.10

$1.83 premium

UndervaluedFair: $1.27Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DE2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$182.20B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.94B8/10

Generating 1.9B in free cash flow

TUSK3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
110.9%10/10

Revenue surging 110.9% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

DE4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.574/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
37.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.1%2/10

Revenue declined 11.1%

TUSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$150.16M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

1.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DE

The strongest argument for DE centers on Market Cap, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : TUSK

The strongest argument for TUSK centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 110.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : DE

The primary concerns for DE are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.29 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TUSK

The primary concerns for TUSK are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Thin 1.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DE profiles as a declining stock while TUSK is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TUSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.18 — expect wider price swings.

TUSK is growing revenue faster at 110.9% — sustainability is the question.

DE generates stronger free cash flow (1.9B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

DE scores higher overall (49/100 vs 42/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Deere & Company

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

John Deere is the brand name of Deere & Company, an American corporation that manufactures agricultural, construction, and forestry machinery, diesel engines, drivetrains (axles, transmissions, gearboxes) used in heavy equipment, and lawn care equipment.

Mammoth Energy Services Inc

INDUSTRIALS · CONGLOMERATES · USA

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. is an oilfield services company. The company is headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?