WallStSmart

AGCO Corporation (AGCO)vsMammoth Energy Services Inc (TUSK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

AGCO Corporation generates 22663% more annual revenue ($10.08B vs $44.29M). TUSK leads profitability with a 10.4% profit margin vs 7.2%. AGCO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

AGCO

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 6.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.26

TUSK

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.0Value: 4.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.23
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AGCOSignificantly Overvalued (-24.6%)

Margin of Safety

-24.6%

Fair Value

$111.12

Current Price

$121.02

$9.90 premium

UndervaluedFair: $111.12Overvalued
TUSKSignificantly Overvalued (-68.3%)

Margin of Safety

-68.3%

Fair Value

$1.42

Current Price

$2.86

$1.44 premium

UndervaluedFair: $1.42Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AGCO3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
922.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 922.0% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TUSK3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
446.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 446.3%

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

AGCO2 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.2%3/10

7.2% margin — thin

TUSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$136.37M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-24.9%2/10

ROE of -24.9% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AGCO

The strongest argument for AGCO centers on P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Price/Book. PEG of 1.12 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TUSK

The strongest argument for TUSK centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : AGCO

The primary concerns for AGCO are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : TUSK

The primary concerns for TUSK are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AGCO profiles as a value stock while TUSK is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

AGCO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.16 — expect wider price swings.

AGCO is growing revenue faster at 1.1% — sustainability is the question.

AGCO generates stronger free cash flow (675M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

AGCO scores higher overall (68/100 vs 48/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

AGCO Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

AGCO Corporation manufactures and distributes agricultural equipment and related spare parts worldwide. The company is headquartered in Duluth, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Mammoth Energy Services Inc

INDUSTRIALS · CONGLOMERATES · USA

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. is an oilfield services company. The company is headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?