WallStSmart

Darling Ingredients Inc (DAR)vsTarget Corporation (TGT)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Target Corporation generates 1545% more annual revenue ($107.70B vs $6.55B). DAR leads profitability with a 9.1% profit margin vs 4.1%. TGT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.11. TGT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

DAR

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.5Value: 6.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.83

TGT

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.0Value: 6.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DARUndervalued (+18.1%)

Margin of Safety

+18.1%

Fair Value

$60.56

Current Price

$55.73

$4.83 discount

UndervaluedFair: $60.56Overvalued
TGTUndervalued (+5.4%)

Margin of Safety

+5.4%

Fair Value

$121.20

Current Price

$154.38

$33.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $121.20Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DAR4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
2914.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 2914.0% YoY

P/E RatioValuation
14.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.4%8/10

16.4% revenue growth

TGT5 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
100.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 100.5% YoY

Market CapQuality
$70.13B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
24.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
16.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.43B8/10

Generating 2.4B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

DAR3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.834/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
4.6%3/10

ROE of 4.6% — below average capital efficiency

PEG RatioValuation
4.312/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

TGT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.114/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
4.1%3/10

4.1% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.053/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DAR

The strongest argument for DAR centers on EPS Growth, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 16.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TGT

The strongest argument for TGT centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : DAR

The primary concerns for DAR are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : TGT

The primary concerns for TGT are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Thin 4.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DAR profiles as a growth stock while TGT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

DAR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.05 — expect wider price swings.

DAR is growing revenue faster at 16.4% — sustainability is the question.

TGT generates stronger free cash flow (2.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

DAR scores higher overall (64/100 vs 64/100) and 16.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Darling Ingredients Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · PACKAGED FOODS · USA

Darling Ingredients Inc. develops, produces and sells natural ingredients from edible and non-edible bio-nutrients. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas.

Visit Website →

Target Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · DISCOUNT STORES · USA

Target Corporation is an American retail corporation. Their retail formats include the discount store Target, the hypermarket SuperTarget, and small-format stores previously named CityTarget and TargetExpress before being consolidated under the Target branding.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?