WallStSmart

Darling Ingredients Inc (DAR)vsTarget Corporation (TGT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Target Corporation generates 1562% more annual revenue ($104.78B vs $6.31B). TGT leads profitability with a 3.5% profit margin vs 3.5%. TGT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.44. TGT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

DAR

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9

TGT

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.48
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DARUndervalued (+26.7%)

Margin of Safety

+26.7%

Fair Value

$67.72

Current Price

$64.38

$3.34 discount

UndervaluedFair: $67.72Overvalued
TGTUndervalued (+33.2%)

Margin of Safety

+33.2%

Fair Value

$171.55

Current Price

$128.81

$42.75 discount

UndervaluedFair: $171.55Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DAR1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TGT4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$58.54B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
24.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
15.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.29B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

DAR4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
1.5%3/10

ROE of 1.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.5%3/10

3.5% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.312/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

TGT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.444/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
3.5%3/10

3.5% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

Operating margin of 4.9%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.5%2/10

Revenue declined 1.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DAR

The strongest argument for DAR centers on Price/Book. Revenue growth of 12.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TGT

The strongest argument for TGT centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : DAR

The primary concerns for DAR are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 46.2x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : TGT

The primary concerns for TGT are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 3.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DAR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.08 — expect wider price swings.

DAR is growing revenue faster at 12.3% — sustainability is the question.

TGT generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor PACKAGED FOODS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TGT scores higher overall (48/100 vs 45/100). DAR offers better value entry with a 26.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Darling Ingredients Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · PACKAGED FOODS · USA

Darling Ingredients Inc. develops, produces and sells natural ingredients from edible and non-edible bio-nutrients. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas.

Visit Website →

Target Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · DISCOUNT STORES · USA

Target Corporation is an American retail corporation. Their retail formats include the discount store Target, the hypermarket SuperTarget, and small-format stores previously named CityTarget and TargetExpress before being consolidated under the Target branding.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?