WallStSmart

Dana Inc (DAN)vsSea Ltd (SE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sea Ltd generates 232% more annual revenue ($25.19B vs $7.59B). DAN leads profitability with a 15.1% profit margin vs 6.4%. SE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.53. DAN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

DAN

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.25

SE

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.5Value: 6.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.53
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for DAN.

SEUndervalued (+52.3%)

Margin of Safety

+52.3%

Fair Value

$240.26

Current Price

$113.43

$126.83 discount

UndervaluedFair: $240.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DAN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
5660.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 5660.0% YoY

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SE3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
46.6%10/10

Revenue surging 46.6% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$65.38B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.289/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

DAN4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.9%4/10

4.9% revenue growth

Operating MarginProfitability
3.4%3/10

Operating margin of 3.4%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.852/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

SE4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.534/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
3.1%4/10

3.1% earnings growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
6.4%3/10

6.4% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DAN

The strongest argument for DAN centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.1% and operating margin at 3.4%.

Bull Case : SE

The strongest argument for SE centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 46.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : DAN

The primary concerns for DAN are Revenue Growth, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : SE

The primary concerns for SE are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score. A P/E of 43.7x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DAN profiles as a value stock while SE is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

DAN carries more volatility with a beta of 1.97 — expect wider price swings.

SE is growing revenue faster at 46.6% — sustainability is the question.

SE generates stronger free cash flow (919M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

DAN scores higher overall (58/100 vs 52/100), backed by strong 15.1% margins. SE offers better value entry with a 52.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Dana Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO PARTS · USA

Dana Incorporated provides energy management and energy transportation solutions for vehicles and machinery in North America, Europe, South America, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Maumee, Ohio.

Sea Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Sea Limited is engaged in the digital entertainment, e-commerce and digital financial services businesses in Southeast Asia, Latin America, the rest of Asia and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?