WallStSmart

California Water Service Group (CWT)vsVistra Corp. (VST)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Vistra Corp. generates 1824% more annual revenue ($19.45B vs $1.01B). CWT leads profitability with a 11.8% profit margin vs 11.5%. VST appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.46. VST earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

CWT

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 6.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.72

VST

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 7.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.60
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWTUndervalued (+21.4%)

Margin of Safety

+21.4%

Fair Value

$56.16

Current Price

$45.82

$10.34 discount

UndervaluedFair: $56.16Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for VST.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWT1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

VST5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4610/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Return on EquityProfitability
40.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 40 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.4%10/10

Revenue surging 43.4% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$53.26B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
26.6%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.6%

Areas to Watch

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.064/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
6.7%3/10

ROE of 6.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-69.3%2/10

Earnings declined 69.3%

VST4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
19.8x4/10

Trading at 19.8x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-52.3%2/10

Earnings declined 52.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : VST

The strongest argument for VST centers on PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 43.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.46 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : VST

The primary concerns for VST are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 3.56 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWT profiles as a value stock while VST is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

VST carries more volatility with a beta of 1.45 — expect wider price swings.

VST is growing revenue faster at 43.4% — sustainability is the question.

VST generates stronger free cash flow (156M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

VST scores higher overall (68/100 vs 51/100) and 43.4% revenue growth. CWT offers better value entry with a 21.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

Vistra Corp.

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Vistra Corp. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?