WallStSmart

California Water Service Group (CWT)vsVistra Corp. (VST)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Vistra Corp. generates 1722% more annual revenue ($19.21B vs $1.05B). CWT leads profitability with a 12.6% profit margin vs 11.6%. VST appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.34. CWT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CWT

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 6.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.72

VST

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 7.0Value: 7.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.62
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWTUndervalued (+21.0%)

Margin of Safety

+21.0%

Fair Value

$55.89

Current Price

$47.15

$8.74 discount

UndervaluedFair: $55.89Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for VST.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWT4 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
28.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.5%8/10

16.5% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
31.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 31.4% YoY

VST3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3410/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Return on EquityProfitability
40.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 40 in profit

Market CapQuality
$51.02B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.224/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
6.7%3/10

ROE of 6.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-83.38M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

VST4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.6x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
16.4x4/10

Trading at 16.4x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.5%2/10

Revenue declined 5.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 16.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : VST

The strongest argument for VST centers on PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Market Cap. PEG of 0.34 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : VST

The primary concerns for VST are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 3.63 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWT profiles as a growth stock while VST is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

VST carries more volatility with a beta of 1.38 — expect wider price swings.

CWT is growing revenue faster at 16.5% — sustainability is the question.

VST generates stronger free cash flow (133M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CWT scores higher overall (67/100 vs 54/100) and 16.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

Vistra Corp.

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Vistra Corp. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?