WallStSmart

California Water Service Group (CWT)vsDuke Energy Corporation (DUK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Duke Energy Corporation generates 3137% more annual revenue ($32.72B vs $1.01B). DUK leads profitability with a 15.7% profit margin vs 11.8%. CWT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.08. DUK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CWT

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 6.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.72

DUK

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.0Value: 3.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWTUndervalued (+21.3%)

Margin of Safety

+21.3%

Fair Value

$56.07

Current Price

$45.20

$10.87 discount

UndervaluedFair: $56.07Overvalued
DUKSignificantly Overvalued (-89.7%)

Margin of Safety

-89.7%

Fair Value

$65.10

Current Price

$124.22

$59.12 premium

UndervaluedFair: $65.10Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWT1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

DUK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$97.67B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
25.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.5%

Areas to Watch

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.084/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
6.7%3/10

ROE of 6.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-69.3%2/10

Earnings declined 69.3%

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.673/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.652/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-2.58B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.7% and operating margin at 25.5%. Revenue growth of 11.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.67 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWT profiles as a value stock while DUK is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

CWT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.52 — expect wider price swings.

DUK is growing revenue faster at 11.3% — sustainability is the question.

CWT generates stronger free cash flow (-80M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

DUK scores higher overall (67/100 vs 51/100), backed by strong 15.7% margins and 11.3% revenue growth. CWT offers better value entry with a 21.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?