WallStSmart

CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV)vsOshkosh Corporation (OSK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Oshkosh Corporation generates 48859% more annual revenue ($10.43B vs $21.30M). OSK leads profitability with a 5.5% profit margin vs -16.9%. CVV appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.89. OSK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

CVV

Hold

37

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.7Quality: 7.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 6.39

OSK

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CVVUndervalued (+35.5%)

Margin of Safety

+35.5%

Fair Value

$6.59

Current Price

$5.55

$1.04 discount

UndervaluedFair: $6.59Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for OSK.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CVV3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.6% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
6.3910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

OSK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.269/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
15.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CVV4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$41.78M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

PEG RatioValuation
4.892/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-15.5%2/10

ROE of -15.5% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-77.8%2/10

Revenue declined 77.8%

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.2%4/10

0.2% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
5.5%3/10

5.5% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

Operating margin of 3.6%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CVV

The strongest argument for CVV centers on EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : CVV

The primary concerns for CVV are Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Operating Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CVV profiles as a turnaround stock while OSK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CVV carries more volatility with a beta of 1.36 — expect wider price swings.

OSK is growing revenue faster at 0.2% — sustainability is the question.

CVV generates stronger free cash flow (-865,000), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

OSK scores higher overall (49/100 vs 37/100). CVV offers better value entry with a 35.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CVD Equipment Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

CVD Equipment Corporation designs, develops, manufactures, and sells equipment and process solutions that are used to develop and manufacture materials and coatings for research and industrial applications in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Central Islip, New York.

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?