WallStSmart

CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV)vsParker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Parker-Hannifin Corporation generates 98440% more annual revenue ($20.99B vs $21.30M). PH leads profitability with a 16.6% profit margin vs -16.9%. PH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.23. PH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

CVV

Hold

37

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.7Quality: 7.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 6.39

PH

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 3.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.78
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CVVUndervalued (+35.5%)

Margin of Safety

+35.5%

Fair Value

$6.59

Current Price

$5.55

$1.04 discount

UndervaluedFair: $6.59Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PH.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CVV3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.6% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
6.3910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$105.45B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
23.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
21.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.5%

Areas to Watch

CVV4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$41.78M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

PEG RatioValuation
4.892/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-15.5%2/10

ROE of -15.5% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-77.8%2/10

Revenue declined 77.8%

PH3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
30.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

PEG RatioValuation
3.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-4.2%2/10

Earnings declined 4.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CVV

The strongest argument for CVV centers on EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bull Case : PH

The strongest argument for PH centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.6% and operating margin at 21.5%. Revenue growth of 10.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CVV

The primary concerns for CVV are Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : PH

The primary concerns for PH are P/E Ratio, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CVV profiles as a turnaround stock while PH is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

CVV carries more volatility with a beta of 1.36 — expect wider price swings.

PH is growing revenue faster at 10.6% — sustainability is the question.

PH generates stronger free cash flow (881M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PH scores higher overall (55/100 vs 37/100), backed by strong 16.6% margins and 10.6% revenue growth. CVV offers better value entry with a 35.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CVD Equipment Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

CVD Equipment Corporation designs, develops, manufactures, and sells equipment and process solutions that are used to develop and manufacture materials and coatings for research and industrial applications in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Central Islip, New York.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?