WallStSmart

CubeSmart (CUBE)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waters Corporation generates 181% more annual revenue ($3.17B vs $1.13B). CUBE leads profitability with a 29.6% profit margin vs 20.3%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.25. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

CUBE

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 8.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.57

WAT

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 9.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CUBESignificantly Overvalued (-297.2%)

Margin of Safety

-297.2%

Fair Value

$9.72

Current Price

$36.20

$26.48 premium

UndervaluedFair: $9.72Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-349.9%)

Margin of Safety

-349.9%

Fair Value

$73.17

Current Price

$302.32

$229.15 premium

UndervaluedFair: $73.17Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CUBE2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
39.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 39.5%

Profit MarginProfitability
29.6%9/10

Keeps 30 of every $100 in revenue as profit

WAT4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.8%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
29.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
20.3%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

CUBE4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Debt/EquityHealth
1.263/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.332/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

WAT2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.1%2/10

Earnings declined 3.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CUBE

The strongest argument for CUBE centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.6% and operating margin at 39.5%.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Operating Margin, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.3% and operating margin at 33.8%. PEG of 1.25 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CUBE

The primary concerns for CUBE are P/E Ratio, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.20 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 6.8% — sustainability is the question.

WAT generates stronger free cash flow (126M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor REIT - INDUSTRIAL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (60/100 vs 54/100), backed by strong 20.3% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CubeSmart

REAL ESTATE · REIT - INDUSTRIAL · USA

CubeSmart is a self-managed and self-managed real estate investment trust.

Visit Website →

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?