WallStSmart

CubeSmart (CUBE)vsUber Technologies Inc (UBER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Uber Technologies Inc generates 4631% more annual revenue ($53.69B vs $1.13B). CUBE leads profitability with a 28.9% profit margin vs 15.9%. UBER appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.51. UBER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

CUBE

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 8.0Value: 6.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.57

UBER

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 6.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CUBEUndervalued (+33.7%)

Margin of Safety

+33.7%

Fair Value

$58.21

Current Price

$40.46

$17.75 discount

UndervaluedFair: $58.21Overvalued
UBERUndervalued (+34.2%)

Margin of Safety

+34.2%

Fair Value

$108.42

Current Price

$75.45

$32.97 discount

UndervaluedFair: $108.42Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CUBE2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
40.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.3%

Profit MarginProfitability
28.9%9/10

Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit

UBER3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
35.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 35 in profit

Market CapQuality
$156.19B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.29B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CUBE4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.3%4/10

3.3% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.263/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

UBER3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-84.6%2/10

Earnings declined 84.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.472/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CUBE

The strongest argument for CUBE centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.9% and operating margin at 40.3%.

Bull Case : UBER

The strongest argument for UBER centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.9% and operating margin at 14.6%. Revenue growth of 14.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CUBE

The primary concerns for CUBE are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : UBER

The primary concerns for UBER are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CUBE profiles as a value stock while UBER is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

UBER carries more volatility with a beta of 1.16 — expect wider price swings.

UBER is growing revenue faster at 14.5% — sustainability is the question.

UBER generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UBER scores higher overall (54/100 vs 49/100), backed by strong 15.9% margins and 14.5% revenue growth. CUBE offers better value entry with a 33.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CubeSmart

REAL ESTATE · REIT - INDUSTRIAL · USA

CubeSmart is a self-managed and self-managed real estate investment trust.

Visit Website →

Uber Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Uber Technologies, Inc., commonly known as Uber, is an American technology company. Its services include ride-hailing, food delivery (Uber Eats), package delivery, couriers, freight transportation, and, through a partnership with Lime, electric bicycle and motorized scooter rental. The company is based in San Francisco, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?