WallStSmart

CubeSmart (CUBE)vsConstellation Brands Inc Class A (STZ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Constellation Brands Inc Class A generates 705% more annual revenue ($9.14B vs $1.13B). CUBE leads profitability with a 28.9% profit margin vs 18.5%. STZ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.74. STZ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

CUBE

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 8.0Value: 6.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.57

STZ

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.95
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CUBEUndervalued (+33.7%)

Margin of Safety

+33.7%

Fair Value

$58.21

Current Price

$40.46

$17.75 discount

UndervaluedFair: $58.21Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for STZ.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CUBE2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
40.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.3%

Profit MarginProfitability
28.9%9/10

Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit

STZ3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
22.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 23 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
15.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
26.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.7%

Areas to Watch

CUBE4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.3%4/10

3.3% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.263/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

STZ4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.954/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.383/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
2.742/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.3%2/10

Revenue declined 11.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CUBE

The strongest argument for CUBE centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.9% and operating margin at 40.3%.

Bull Case : STZ

The strongest argument for STZ centers on Return on Equity, P/E Ratio, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.5% and operating margin at 26.7%.

Bear Case : CUBE

The primary concerns for CUBE are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : STZ

The primary concerns for STZ are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CUBE profiles as a value stock while STZ is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

CUBE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.11 — expect wider price swings.

CUBE is growing revenue faster at 3.3% — sustainability is the question.

STZ generates stronger free cash flow (344M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

STZ scores higher overall (56/100 vs 49/100), backed by strong 18.5% margins. CUBE offers better value entry with a 33.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CubeSmart

REAL ESTATE · REIT - INDUSTRIAL · USA

CubeSmart is a self-managed and self-managed real estate investment trust.

Visit Website →

Constellation Brands Inc Class A

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - BREWERS · USA

Constellation Brands, Inc., headquartered in Victor, New York, is an American producer and marketer of beer, wine, and spirits.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?