WallStSmart

CubeSmart (CUBE)vsRe Max Holding (RMAX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

CubeSmart generates 286% more annual revenue ($1.13B vs $291.60M). CUBE leads profitability with a 29.6% profit margin vs 2.8%. RMAX appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.07. CUBE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

CUBE

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 8.0Value: 6.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.57

RMAX

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 5.5Value: 4.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CUBEUndervalued (+33.0%)

Margin of Safety

+33.0%

Fair Value

$57.58

Current Price

$40.48

$17.10 discount

UndervaluedFair: $57.58Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for RMAX.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CUBE2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
39.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 39.5%

Profit MarginProfitability
29.6%9/10

Keeps 30 of every $100 in revenue as profit

RMAX2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
24.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 24.0%

Areas to Watch

CUBE4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Debt/EquityHealth
1.263/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.332/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

RMAX4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Market CapQuality
$607.91M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
0.2%3/10

ROE of 0.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.8%3/10

2.8% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CUBE

The strongest argument for CUBE centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.6% and operating margin at 39.5%.

Bull Case : RMAX

The strongest argument for RMAX centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : CUBE

The primary concerns for CUBE are P/E Ratio, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : RMAX

The primary concerns for RMAX are P/E Ratio, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Thin 2.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CUBE profiles as a mature stock while RMAX is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

RMAX carries more volatility with a beta of 1.27 — expect wider price swings.

CUBE is growing revenue faster at 5.6% — sustainability is the question.

CUBE generates stronger free cash flow (122M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CUBE scores higher overall (51/100 vs 44/100), backed by strong 29.6% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CubeSmart

REAL ESTATE · REIT - INDUSTRIAL · USA

CubeSmart is a self-managed and self-managed real estate investment trust.

Visit Website →

Re Max Holding

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE SERVICES · USA

RE / MAX Holdings, Inc. is a franchisor of real estate and mortgage brokerage services in the United States, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Denver, Colorado.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?