WallStSmart

Cintas Corporation (CTAS)vsUnifirst Corporation (UNF)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cintas Corporation generates 341% more annual revenue ($10.79B vs $2.45B). CTAS leads profitability with a 17.6% profit margin vs 5.7%. UNF appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.42. CTAS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

CTAS

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 9.0Value: 4.7Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 4.29

UNF

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CTASSignificantly Overvalued (-78.1%)

Margin of Safety

-78.1%

Fair Value

$112.48

Current Price

$176.85

$64.37 premium

UndervaluedFair: $112.48Overvalued
UNFSignificantly Overvalued (-357.3%)

Margin of Safety

-357.3%

Fair Value

$51.41

Current Price

$262.21

$210.80 premium

UndervaluedFair: $51.41Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CTAS4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
43.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 43 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.2910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Market CapQuality
$70.75B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
23.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.4%

UNF1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CTAS3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
38.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
15.2x4/10

Trading at 15.2x book value

PEG RatioValuation
2.922/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

UNF4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.424/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
34.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.7%4/10

2.7% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
6.5%3/10

ROE of 6.5% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CTAS

The strongest argument for CTAS centers on Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.6% and operating margin at 23.4%.

Bull Case : UNF

The strongest argument for UNF centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : CTAS

The primary concerns for CTAS are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : UNF

The primary concerns for UNF are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CTAS profiles as a mature stock while UNF is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CTAS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.94 — expect wider price swings.

CTAS is growing revenue faster at 9.3% — sustainability is the question.

CTAS generates stronger free cash flow (425M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CTAS scores higher overall (60/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 17.6% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cintas Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses.

Unifirst Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

UniFirst Corporation provides workplace uniforms and protective work clothing in the United States, Europe, and Canada. The company is headquartered in Wilmington, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?