WallStSmart

Cintas Corporation (CTAS)vsQuad Graphics Inc (QUAD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cintas Corporation generates 365% more annual revenue ($11.03B vs $2.37B). CTAS leads profitability with a 17.6% profit margin vs 1.2%. QUAD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.84. CTAS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

CTAS

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 9.0Value: 2.7Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 4.29

QUAD

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.53
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CTASSignificantly Overvalued (-38.5%)

Margin of Safety

-38.5%

Fair Value

$144.61

Current Price

$179.85

$35.24 premium

UndervaluedFair: $144.61Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QUAD.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CTAS4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
40.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 40 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.2910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Market CapQuality
$69.91B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
23.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.2%

QUAD3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
25.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.848/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
12.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

CTAS3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
36.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
15.0x4/10

Trading at 15.0x book value

PEG RatioValuation
2.762/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

QUAD4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$386.70M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
1.2%3/10

1.2% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

Operating margin of 4.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CTAS

The strongest argument for CTAS centers on Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.6% and operating margin at 23.2%.

Bull Case : QUAD

The strongest argument for QUAD centers on Return on Equity, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. PEG of 0.84 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CTAS

The primary concerns for CTAS are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : QUAD

The primary concerns for QUAD are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 3.98 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 1.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CTAS profiles as a mature stock while QUAD is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

QUAD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.12 — expect wider price swings.

CTAS is growing revenue faster at 8.9% — sustainability is the question.

CTAS generates stronger free cash flow (531M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CTAS scores higher overall (58/100 vs 56/100), backed by strong 17.6% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cintas Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses.

Quad Graphics Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Quad / Graphics, Inc. offers worldwide marketing solutions. The company is headquartered in Sussex, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?