WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsZoom Video Communications Inc (ZM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 8% more annual revenue ($5.40B vs $4.99B). ZM leads profitability with a 65.2% profit margin vs 0.8%. ZM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.72. ZM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).

CRWD

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 9.3Profit: 3.0Value: 3.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.00

ZM

Strong Buy

71

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.0Profit: 8.5Value: 5.7Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 5.15

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Market CapQuality
$211.69B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.169/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.8%8/10

Revenue surging 25.8% year-over-year

ZM6 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Profit MarginProfitability
65.2%10/10

Keeps 65 of every $100 in revenue as profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
342.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 342.3% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.1510/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
28.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.8%3/10

0.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.682/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

ZM2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.9%4/10

4.9% revenue growth

PEG RatioValuation
2.722/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 25.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : ZM

The strongest argument for ZM centers on P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 65.2% and operating margin at 24.6%.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 5168.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : ZM

The primary concerns for ZM are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD profiles as a growth stock while ZM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CRWD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 25.8% — sustainability is the question.

ZM generates stronger free cash flow (472M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ZM scores higher overall (71/100 vs 43/100), backed by strong 65.2% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

Zoom Video Communications Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Zoom Video Communications, Inc. provides a premier video communications platform in the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?