WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsQ2 Holdings (QTWO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 520% more annual revenue ($5.09B vs $821.58M). QTWO leads profitability with a 9.0% profit margin vs -0.6%. CRWD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 6.22. QTWO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

CRWD

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 9.3Profit: 2.0Value: 3.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.00

QTWO

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 3.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.76
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRWDSignificantly Overvalued (-82.3%)

Margin of Safety

-82.3%

Fair Value

$99.74

Current Price

$179.38

$79.64 premium

UndervaluedFair: $99.74Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QTWO.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$191.86B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.189/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.6%8/10

Revenue surging 25.6% year-over-year

QTWO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
471.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 471.4% YoY

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.222/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
39.4x2/10

Trading at 39.4x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-0.5%2/10

ROE of -0.5% — below average capital efficiency

QTWO3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
8.942/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
49.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.762/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 25.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : QTWO

The strongest argument for QTWO centers on EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 14.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : QTWO

The primary concerns for QTWO are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score. A P/E of 49.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD profiles as a growth stock while QTWO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

QTWO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.33 — expect wider price swings.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 25.6% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (493M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QTWO scores higher overall (51/100 vs 39/100) and 14.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

Q2 Holdings

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Q2 Holdings, Inc. provides cloud-based digital banking solutions to Community and Regional Financial Institutions (RCFIs) in the United States. The company is headquartered in Austin, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?